Dan Markovitz
By
December 02, 2016

ARTICLE: Structure & Clutter

Screenshot 2016-12-02 20.17.11.png

Flow is one of the key tenets of lean. To that end, continuous improvement professionals exert enormous effort to improve both information and material flow in factories.

 However, we don’t usually see as much effort in the office environment, where knowledge—not widgets—is the product, and the cost of poor flow is not as easily quantified. Information processes and flow are usually less-well defined in the first place, and often encrusted with bureaucratic barnacles that do nothing but impede flow.

Peter Drucker once quipped that, “Much of what we call management consists of making it difficult for people to work.” I suspect that Drucker was saying poor management makes it harder for people to work. Good management—a rarity—makes it easier. The truth is that all business processes require a certain amount of management structure to enable operations to flow smoothly, but often it’s the wrong amount of structure for the job at hand.

With no structure at all, you have total chaos—no one knows what needs to be done, who’s responsible for doing it, or even what the goals are. Many start up companies exist in this zone, although they’re often saved from disaster by virtue of having everyone sitting in the same room. They survive the lack of structure by virtue of easy, uncomplicated communication channels. As they grow, however, they either create appropriate process structures or they die.

When there’s just a bit of structure, the pain of rework bites hard. At a $500M footwear company I once worked with, the founder and CEO—long removed from his role product development—decided that he didn’t like a particular style his product team had designed, developed, and purchased. He diverted a container that was en route to the US with $400,000 worth of shoes to Africa, where he unloaded everything at a loss. The sales, marketing, product, and customer service teams were stuck at the 11th hour (well, the 12th hour, actually) adjusting for the CEO’s violation of structure.

Too much structure creates business clutter, which is typically manifested as excessive (and often low-value) meetings, the necessity of obtaining approvals from multiple tiers of management, an overload of initiatives, and a nearly suffocating volume of email. By now it’s practically a business fable, but when Alan Mulally took the reins at Ford in 2006, senior management actually had “meetings week”—five days each month in which executives held non-stop meetings. The preparation for that week, combined with the burden of having the leadership team unavailable for such a long period of time, hamstrung Ford’s ability to react to operational issues in a timely manner.

When structure reaches its extreme, the organization effectively suffers bureaucratic paralysis. Virtually nothing gets done. Government agencies are the poster children for this condition, although many companies experience it on a localized level. The stories are, in the most literal sense, nearly unbelievable: manager approval required for replacing an ID badge, or two approvals (!) needed to order new toner for a copy machine. 

The right amount of structure for business processes fosters coordination without dangerous ambiguity or administrative burden. Looked at from a lean lens, this is the place on the continuum where the rules and structures create the most value with the minimum waste. WL Gore’s lattice” structure of management is an excellent example of an organization in this position. The $3 billion company broadly distributes leadership responsibility throughout the organization, allowing employees to make “above the waterline” (i.e., low-risk) decisions on their own, and only requiring approvals for “below the waterline” (high-risk) decisions.

It would be nearly impossible for another company to copy Gore’s model of management. But it’s very much within the purview of the OpEx professional to apply this kind of thinking to the various office and administrative processes in any firm. It’s simply a matter of adding another layer of analysis to the standard value stream analysis that’s already being done.

View Dan's Contributor Profile

BTOE_Awards_Long_Ad.png


Download the most comprehensive OpEx Resport in the Industry

The Largest Leadership-Level Business Transformation & Operational Excellence Event

The Business Transformation & Operational Excellence Industry Awards

Welcome to BTOES Insights, the content portal for Business Transformation & Operational Excellence opinions, reports & news.
504x672
AWARD 2019-1
Copy of Copy of btoes19
Subscribe to Business Transformation & Operational Excellence Insights Now
btoes19.png
png
certificate
png
btoes19healthcare
png
3-30
png
Copy of Copy of btoes19 (1)
png

Featured Content

  • Best Achievement of Operational Excellence in Technology & Communications: IBM
  • Best Achievement of Operational Excellence in Oil & Gas, Power & Utilities: Black & Veatch
  • Best Achievement in Cultural Transformation to deliver a high performing Operational Excellence culture: NextEra Energy
   
Operational Excellence Frameworks and Learning Resources, Customer Experience, Digital Transformation and more introductions
  • Intelligent BPM Systems: Impact & Opportunity
  • Surviving_the_IT_Talent_deficit.png
  • Six Sigma's Best Kept Secret: Motorola & The Malcolm Baldrige Awards
  • The Value-Switch for Digitalization Initiatives: Business Process Management
  • Process of Process Management: Strategy Execution in a Digital World

Popular Tags

Operational Excellence Business Transformation Business Improvement Process Management Continuous Improvement Business Excellence process excellence Process Optimization Process Improvement Leadership Premium Enterprise Excellence Change Management Lean Lean Enterprise Organizational Excellence Execution Excellence Lean Six Sigma Capability Excellence BTOES18 Changing & Improving Company Culture New Technologies Culture Transformation end-to-end Business Transformation Agile Execution & Sustaining OpEx Projects Lack of/Need for Resources Leadership Understanding & Buy-In Adapting to Business Trends Changing Customer Demands Failure to Innovate Integrating CI Methodologies Lack of/Need for Skilled Workers Lack of/Need for Support from Employees Maintaining key Priorities Relationships Between Departments Digital Transformation Healthcare and Medical Devices Culture Customer Experience Exclusive BTOES Video Presentations BTOES HEALTH Technology Process Automation Strategy Execution Innovation Report Manufacturing BPM Lean Manufacturing Agility Systems Engineering Process Design Healthcare Awards BTOES Presentation Slides value creation Robotic Process Automation Insurance data management innovation execution thought leaders digital operations Customer Experience Excellence Professional Services Banking and Capital Markets Data Analytics White Paper Artificial Intelligence BTOES19 Consumer Products & Retail Operational Excellence Model Project Management Automotive and Transportation Digital business expansion revenue growth investment banking Interview Operational Excellence Example Primary Measure of succes Lean Culture Learning organization NPS Net Promoter Score Six Sigma business process automation transformation journey Data Frameworks Hoshin Planning Pharmaceuticals & Life Sciences Workplace Analytics BTOES17 Business Growth Client Feedback Strategy Communication Denial Management Education HealthcareTechnologies Hospitality & Construction Human Centered Design Innovation in Healthcare Integrated Decision Approach Integrated Decision Making Kaizen Oil and Gas Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Supply Chain Management Telecommunications Text Mining eHealth master text analytics virtual resource management Announcement BTOES18 Award Winners BTOES18 Awards Communications Employee Engagement Infographic Jidoka Learning Resource Oil & Gas Recruitment Team The FAST lane